clauclauclaudia (
clauclauclaudia) wrote2004-11-04 03:04 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
blue states, red states
Yes, it's very frustrating as a "blue" voter (okay, I hate these terms, but they've become universal shorthand) to see the geographical map, on which red is super-abundant even in election years that are not this one. I like to double-check with maps like http://www.electoral-vote.com/carto/nov04c.html , which are proportional by population rather than by area.
I also like the map that
postvixen put up, and her reasons for posting it. By and large, the "red states" aren't all that red and the "blue states" aren't all that blue, you know. Here's her post, and thank you to MSNBC.com and BoingBoing for the map.
I decided to combine the two and look at a purple, population-proportionate map. And it's behind the cut.
Note that I had to improvise DC, as it wasn't painted in the MSNBC original. But it went 90% Kerry, so that's about right.

Now I want to see the same thing by county. Anyone?
[No image? Try http://www.offhand.org/claudia/images/purple-proportional-map.jpg ]
[Edited 1/28/2012: for posterity, more and better maps at http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/2004/ and elsewhere on that site ]
I also like the map that
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
I decided to combine the two and look at a purple, population-proportionate map. And it's behind the cut.
Note that I had to improvise DC, as it wasn't painted in the MSNBC original. But it went 90% Kerry, so that's about right.

Now I want to see the same thing by county. Anyone?
[No image? Try http://www.offhand.org/claudia/images/purple-proportional-map.jpg ]
[Edited 1/28/2012: for posterity, more and better maps at http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/2004/ and elsewhere on that site ]
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/vote2004/countymap.htm
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Would you mind if I posted this to
Let me know, okay?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
http://obsidianorder.blogspot.com/2004/10/red-and-blue-mapping-votes.html
no subject
I encourage you to, if you hate the shorthand, to refuse to use it. We don't have to adopt commonly-used terms to be understood, especially if the metaphors are either ridiculous or frame (http://www.changethis.com/5.GeorgeLakoff) a discussion in emotion terms we disagree with or find invalid.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
* is amused that Calif. comes out so square *
By county
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2004_11/005122.php (http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2004_11/005122.php)