clauclauclaudia: (Face at Stonehenge)
clauclauclaudia ([personal profile] clauclauclaudia) wrote2010-09-27 03:08 pm
Entry tags:

okay, without looking it up...

Does this usage of eponymous seem okay to you or not? Why?

[blah blah Chekhov on film] "Based on his eponymous 1891 novella, THE DUEL gives life to a classic Chekhovian tale...."


All right. Look it up if you want to, but let me know if you do.

I'm screening comments for a bit to get independent answers, but I'll unscreen them soonish. [Edit: slow unscreening now complete.]

[identity profile] ophblekuwufu.livejournal.com 2010-09-27 08:25 pm (UTC)(link)
I suppose it's probably all right. It does seem very weird, though-- usually eponymous is used to refer to people, rather than topics. And that seems like a more useful word to have, too-- I mean, with the broader definition I could make an argument for the eponymous Wheel of Time (though I'd deserve to be smacked for it).