Enggggggg. 1. I'd probably use it that way. 2. Technically, Chekhov's eponymous novella would have to be named Chekhov. But that strict definition isn't really in practice. Still, the occasional reader might go "wait, what?" which is never what you want. 3. See #1.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2010-09-27 08:04 pm (UTC)1. I'd probably use it that way.
2. Technically, Chekhov's eponymous novella would have to be named Chekhov. But that strict definition isn't really in practice. Still, the occasional reader might go "wait, what?" which is never what you want.
3. See #1.